OPINION

States' Rights - What is Left For India?

February 05, 2008
Abhinandan Mishra

Another example of spineless governance from the Congress party was seen as a bunch of goons in Mumbai held a city to ransom and assaulted poor migrant laborers in full public view. Their crime- they hailed from the Eastern states of India like Bihar, UP and Jharkhand.

It is just impossible to believe that a person like Raj Thackeray with no political standing and following can carry out this ‘regional cleansing’ without any political patronage.

I am no BJP supporter. The BJP did the same in Gujarat in the post-Godhra period, the State government in Gujarat kept mum as the minority class was butchered. The same thing is true about Congress in the present case. Innocent people who strive hard to earn two pieces of meal are beaten up; their means of employment broken and the state continues to look the other way.

It is situations like these that feeds the fuel to anarchy ; where the oppressed finding no one to safeguards his rights and legitimate interest takes the ‘law’ ( which in the first place has been torn to pieces by the perpetrator) in his own hand. Clashes start and gradually it spreads into wherever it sees an opportunity to thrive.

And it is situations like these that shows how helpless the common mass still is.

Fortunately there has been no counter reaction from the people of the states from which the victims hail and one can only imagine that what would happen if their belief that goons like Raj Thackeray will be brought to the books is shattered.

The Shiv Sena was earlier more of a pawn which the Congress used to its benefit, and now the same Shiv Sena runs a parallel government in Maharashtra. There is more than enough evidence to book Bal Thackeray for the anti-Muslim riots of 1992 but he is still out because successive state government have said that his arrest may lead to large scale violence.

Sometimes people forget that pawns never remain a pawn, after completing the required steps it becomes a very powerful ‘Wazir’. Same was the case with Bal Thackeray and god forbidding same will be the result in Raj’s case if the state continues to keep its eyes shut.

There are provisions in law which are enough to haul Raj Thackeray into the prisons but as has been the misfortune of this country legal provisions have always been made but never applied; even if they are then its the poor that face them and rarely the powerful.

Raj Thackeray’s ambition for a greater role in Maharashtra has fueled his narrow mentality and his good organizational skill has helped him gather a sizable following. Not surprisingly he follows his idol, Adolf Hitler, whom he admires for his organizational skill.

The precedent that is being set by the Congress ruled state is very detrimental for the framework of this country. The north-eastern states of Assam and its sisters have been facing this issue of regionalism for long and no one can forget that anti-Hindi movement that was seen in the southern states of India.

Vote bank politics drives everything in this country and times are rare when political parties rise over it but this is truly a time when they need to look at things apolitically.

Another very important point of focus is the lack of employment in these BIMARU states. The state machinery of these North Eastern states needs to work on improving the existing employment opportunity and take up development work that will increase the employment level. Once this has been achieved the migration will come down.

Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel took lots of pain to integrate the erstwhile 600 princely states into one dominion - India - and now we have Thackeray who is hell bent on undoing the efforts of Vallabhbhai.

Going by the recent happenings, Maharashtra for Marathi, Punjab for Punjabi and Bihar for Bihari doesn’t look far. It will soon be a reality if the leaders continue to follow their ‘modest’ political ambitions but who can wake the slumber of those who sleep in Delhi.

In the end, if this happens, what will be left of India? 

A law graduate from NLIU, Bhopal.Worked for 2 years as a journalist in media organizations like Qatar Tribune, PTI and UNI. Now more of just 'a writer' rather than a 'paid' writer.
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

States' Rights - What is Left For India?

Article

Author: Abhinandan Mishra

 

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
Balaji Viswanathan
URL
February 5, 2008
06:40 PM

This is a nation within a nation, crisis. India has this peculiar case. It is neither a nation-state in the classical sense like say China or UK or Germany, nor is it a amorphous union like the EU or ASEAN. We have some characteristics of both, and having 1.1 billion people with over 10 langauges having suffient critical mass to be independent interntaional languages on their own right poses some serious problems. And the main issue being, while we had some common culture India was never a single nation except for the glorious struggle led by Gandhiji and had very little common history. Even our freedom movement before world war-I was highly state-centric.

As the memories of freedom struggle wade out, and as the freedom winning party sent to dogs, we need to do some soul searching on what binds us a nation. Do we have something other than Cricket where we work together as a nation?

As the nation gets more wealthy we will see these state-centric tendencies to grow stronger, rather weaker. Days might not be far when people and their politicans might forget the various interdepencies and would start questioning why should the prosperous Maharashtra, Gujrat, Punjab and Tamilnadu need to subsidize BIMARU states.

We have such massive internal migration because we have only a very few centers of growth. India's center and east hardly has any such center, while the south has Bangalore, Chennai and Hyderabad, and the north has Delhi and Gurgoun. So, it becomes imperative for the government to start new centers of economic growth. They should try to start building up massive cities in the Bihar-Orissa Region, that could tap the regions's energy, mineral reserves and coastline with plenty of cheap, surplus labor.

The central government has to realize that we have a real national crisis at hand, and waste no time in spreading economic development. Modis and Thackareys are not alone in their quest for this ethnic-cleansing.

#2
smallsquirrel
February 6, 2008
05:51 AM

This is just another case of scapegoating (another trick stolen from the pages of Hitler) so as to try to cover up one's own fault. shiv sena doesn't want to be blamed for mumbaikers' hardships, and it becomes so much easier to deflect attention away from one's own issues if you point the attention at others and make a big hullabaloo. and AGAIN the poor get blamed when all they are trying to do is make a living.

for the most part the average maharashtran is simply a pawn in this ugly thing... I don't think the majority of the people interviewed know any better. they just want jobs, they see people from bihar or orissa in what they perceive as "their" city with jobs, and that Thackeray just lights the fire... it's despicable

one would think that the people who went on the rampage should know better, but unfortunately when people perceive that they are under threat, they behave badly. it is a pretty predictable response, although a sad one and not one I am trying to defend here.

In the meantime, while Thackeray has deployed his "divide and conquer" methods I am sure he's up to something else more sinister in the meantime.

it's pretty damned sad.

#3
Ledzius
February 6, 2008
10:35 AM

Didn't Nixon say "Those who believe that India is not governed well should wonder that it is governed at all".

Looking at the happenings today, even this statement seems pretty generous towards India.

Add your comment

(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/7235)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!