REVIEW

DVD Review: Lolita

March 20, 2006
Nandhu

Lolita marks the beginning of what I consider to be Kubrick's creative peak. Three films made before Lolita are quite famous too, including the Kirk Douglas-starrer Spartacus. But after Lolita's arrival, Kubrick simply outdid almost everybody else in Hollywood at that time. His movies may have been mainstream, but had none of the usual Hollywood marks on it.

The films that were to come later, especially Dr Stranglove and 2001: A Space Oddyssey, were critically so well-received that I think that perhaps Kubrick had to live the rest of his life living down those movies.
No matter what success he achieved with Clockwork Orange or Barry Lyndon, he was seen as largely a sixties director who never made it again. And the mixed reviews for Eyes Wide Shut didn't help him much.

I haven't seen Spartacus, but Kubrick's craft certainly shot to great heights somewhere between The Killer and Lolita.

Lolita's central theme, both as a film and a novel, is that it potrays a sexual abuser sympathetically and almost as a victim. Humbert Humbert, who arrives in the US to teach, develops a fascination for his landlady's daughter, Dolores Haze, and marries her mother solely to be close to Lo.

The movie deals with Humbert's perverse sexuality, his subsequent fall from the eyes of the society and the most crushing blow - Lo's betrayal of his love. Humbert is played by James Mason, a forgotten actor now, but a notable star of the sixties. He is superbly cast and gives an unusually understated performance. A look of self pity, that's almost stuck to Mason's face at all times, suits his character to a T.

The scene in the hospital when he realises that Quilty has stolen his Lo, is superbly shot by Kubrick. Aided almost by the play of light in that scene, Kubrick brilliantly potrays his character's fall from grace.

The remake is an effeciently made movie by Adrian Lyne. In colour, the landscape of southern America is all the more brilliant. But the internal conflicts that these characters suffer are more satisfying in black and white. Also, Lyne instead of creating a new language for himself, almost copies Kubrick frame by frame.

I am a Chennai-based journalist writing on film and Tamil Nadu politics.
eXTReMe Tracker
Keep reading for comments on this article and add some feedback of your own!

DVD Review: Lolita

Article

Author: Nandhu

 

Comments! Feedback! Speak and be heard!

Comment on this article or leave feedback for the author

#1
The Comic Project
URL
March 20, 2006
09:08 AM

Jeremy Irons' performance was a killer. His journey from fascination to "love" to obsession is depicted brilliantly. One of my favourite movies and I haven't seen the original.

#2
Nandhu
URL
March 22, 2006
09:48 AM

Perhaps you shuld see the original as well. the remakes pales in comparison to the Kubrick movie.

#3
Nandhu
URL
March 22, 2006
09:48 AM

Perhaps you shuld see the original as well. the remake pales in comparison to the Kubrick movie.

#4
Al Barger
URL
March 22, 2006
04:06 PM

I wouldn't see Humbert as being a "sympathetic" character much at all. I doubt that was the director's intention. You might be a bit sympathetic to his attraction to Lolita, maybe.

But he was six kinds of a jerk- even if you discount the idea of "sexual abuse." You might be able to wrap your mind around forgiving him for wanting the girl, but his contemptuous attitude and treatment of the mother was just awful.

He reached a clear breaking point there with me when he's sitting in his room reading mom's declaration of love and doubled up in contemptuous and near hysterical laughter. From that point, he could have caught a bullet anytime and it would have been fine by me.

#5
Nandhu
URL
March 23, 2006
07:18 AM

humbert humbert is defenitely a disgusting character. but by narrating the movie through his eyes, kubrick does in some way justify his fasination for Lolita. at the end of the movie, he is more of a victim that Lolita is. humbert murdering quilty is so pointless until he delivers what i think to be the movie's pivotal line. he tells quilty that he quilty deprived him of his only chance at redemption, which is actually a life with Lolita.
the character of Lolita's mother, i thought, wasn't really potrayed in a sympathetic light. the only time i felt sorry for her is when she dies. but humbert is clearly not to blame for this.

Add your comment

(Or ping: http://desicritics.org/tb/982)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.






Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!